>
Journal · Audit Process

Why you build your compliance position before IBM finishes theirs.

Every IBM audit is a race between two compliance positions, theirs and yours. Whoever reaches a defensible number first sets the anchor the rest of the engagement argues around. Build yours before IBM finishes theirs and you negotiate from strength instead of chasing their count down.

Two positions are being built at once

From the day the notice arrives, IBM is assembling a compliance position. Its auditors take the data you provide, apply their reading of every metric, and arrive at a number. Most companies do not start building their own position until the findings land, which means they spend the back half of the audit reacting to a calculation that was framed entirely by the other side.

The stronger move is to build in parallel. While IBM works its model, you run your own recount of processor value units, validate sub capacity against corrected ILMT data, and map every deployment to an entitlement. By the time findings appear, you already hold a defensible number to put against them.

Why the first credible number wins

Audits anchor on whatever defensible figure appears first. If IBM presents a full capacity calculation before you have anything to counter it, that figure becomes the baseline and every concession is measured against it. You are then arguing the number down from a ceiling IBM chose.

Reverse the order and the dynamic changes. When you bring a reconciled, evidence backed position to the table early, IBM has to argue against your floor. Challenges land 30 to 50 percent of findings on average, and they land harder when your numbers were on the record first.

What building your position involves

The Reconcile step in practice

This is the Reconcile step in how we work: run our own calculation against your entitlements before IBM finishes theirs. It only works if it happens early, because a position built after the findings are public is a rebuttal, while a position built before them is the baseline. The difference is worth millions on a large estate.

What this means under audit

IBM will build a compliance position whether or not you build one. If yours is ready first, the negotiation starts from your defensible number. If it is not, you spend the audit arguing IBM down from a ceiling it set. Build first, and you hold the anchor.

Should I wait for IBM findings before calculating my own position?
No. Building your position after the findings are public makes it a rebuttal to IBM's anchor. Building it first makes your number the baseline the audit negotiates around.
How much of an audit finding can be challenged?
On average, challenges land 30 to 50 percent of findings. The reduction is larger when your reconciled position is on the record before IBM completes its own calculation.

The letter just landed?

Our Audit Defense engagement runs the Contain and Reconcile steps for you. We scope every byte before it reaches IBM and build your independent position first. We mobilize within 48 hours of your audit notice.

See Audit Defense →
Related reading

The IBM Audit Brief

Audit triggers, ILMT pitfalls, and settlement tactics for IBM software buyers.

IBM Audit

Independent, buyer side IBM software audit defense and negotiation. Not affiliated with IBM Corporation.

Services
Audit DefenseAudit NegotiationILMT RemediationSub-Capacity Defense
Products
WebSphereDb2CognosCloud Pak
Company
AboutContactJournalWhite Papers
Independent. Not affiliated with IBM Corporation.Buyer Side · Est. 2019